Neosho County -- Population by Single Year of Age and Gender 2000 | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 103 | 1.3% | 90 | 1.0% | |
1 | 93 | 1.1% | 98 | 1.1% | |
2 | 112 | 1.4% | 103 | 1.2% | |
3 | 119 | 1.4% | 98 | 1.1% | |
4 | 102 | 1.2% | 100 | 1.1% | |
5 | 104 | 1.3% | 108 | 1.2% | |
6 | 116 | 1.4% | 104 | 1.2% | |
7 | 117 | 1.4% | 108 | 1.2% | |
8 | 113 | 1.4% | 112 | 1.3% | |
9 | 153 | 1.9% | 131 | 1.5% | |
10 | 126 | 1.5% | 113 | 1.3% | |
11 | 134 | 1.6% | 120 | 1.4% | |
12 | 125 | 1.5% | 139 | 1.6% | |
13 | 123 | 1.5% | 141 | 1.6% | |
14 | 148 | 1.8% | 154 | 1.8% | |
15 | 121 | 1.5% | 167 | 1.9% | |
16 | 140 | 1.7% | 129 | 1.5% | |
17 | 137 | 1.7% | 160 | 1.8% | |
18 | 156 | 1.9% | 145 | 1.7% | |
19 | 152 | 1.9% | 123 | 1.4% | |
20 | 130 | 1.6% | 116 | 1.3% | Click the figure above to animate by years.
|
21 | 97 | 1.2% | 81 | 0.9% | |
22 | 79 | 1.0% | 88 | 1.0% | |
23 | 85 | 1.0% | 80 | 0.9% |
Policy Research Institute Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 data from Summary Tape File 2B 1990 data from Summary Tape File 2B 2000 data from Summary File 1 Please email comments to: pri@ku.edu |
24 | 90 | 1.1% | 89 | 1.0% | |
25 | 83 | 1.0% | 98 | 1.1% | |
26 | 69 | 0.8% | 60 | 0.7% | |
27 | 76 | 0.9% | 82 | 0.9% | |
28 | 106 | 1.3% | 99 | 1.1% | |
29 | 93 | 1.1% | 89 | 1.0% | |
30 | 95 | 1.2% | 82 | 0.9% | |
31 | 103 | 1.3% | 76 | 0.9% | |
32 | 90 | 1.1% | 102 | 1.2% | |
33 | 97 | 1.2% | 99 | 1.1% | |
34 | 98 | 1.2% | 124 | 1.4% | |
35 | 113 | 1.4% | 112 | 1.3% | |
36 | 110 | 1.3% | 105 | 1.2% | |
37 | 124 | 1.5% | 123 | 1.4% | |
38 | 124 | 1.5% | 157 | 1.8% | |
39 | 124 | 1.5% | 118 | 1.3% | |
40 | 136 | 1.7% | 121 | 1.4% | |
41 | 124 | 1.5% | 126 | 1.4% | |
42 | 126 | 1.5% | 121 | 1.4% |
(Neosho County continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
43 | 137 | 1.7% | 136 | 1.5% | |
44 | 143 | 1.7% | 120 | 1.4% | |
45 | 128 | 1.6% | 117 | 1.3% | |
46 | 129 | 1.6% | 114 | 1.3% | |
47 | 89 | 1.1% | 137 | 1.6% | |
48 | 112 | 1.4% | 95 | 1.1% | |
49 | 122 | 1.5% | 98 | 1.1% | |
50 | 105 | 1.3% | 104 | 1.2% | |
51 | 106 | 1.3% | 112 | 1.3% | |
52 | 105 | 1.3% | 125 | 1.4% | |
53 | 109 | 1.3% | 121 | 1.4% | |
54 | 83 | 1.0% | 86 | 1.0% | |
55 | 87 | 1.1% | 88 | 1.0% | |
56 | 79 | 1.0% | 93 | 1.1% | |
57 | 85 | 1.0% | 86 | 1.0% | |
58 | 70 | 0.9% | 87 | 1.0% | |
59 | 70 | 0.9% | 80 | 0.9% | |
60 | 84 | 1.0% | 87 | 1.0% | |
61 | 91 | 1.1% | 69 | 0.8% | |
62 | 79 | 1.0% | 80 | 0.9% | |
63 | 59 | 0.7% | 84 | 1.0% | Click the figure above to animate by years.
|
64 | 79 | 1.0% | 90 | 1.0% | |
65 | 80 | 1.0% | 77 | 0.9% |
Policy Research Institute Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 data from Summary Tape File 2B 1990 data from Summary Tape File 2B 2000 data from Summary File 1 Please email comments to: pri@ku.edu |
66 | 49 | 0.6% | 66 | 0.8% | |
67 | 66 | 0.8% | 68 | 0.8% | |
68 | 59 | 0.7% | 93 | 1.1% | |
69 | 60 | 0.7% | 91 | 1.0% | |
70 | 62 | 0.8% | 80 | 0.9% | |
71 | 68 | 0.8% | 83 | 0.9% | |
72 | 73 | 0.9% | 86 | 1.0% | |
73 | 61 | 0.7% | 88 | 1.0% | |
74 | 63 | 0.8% | 67 | 0.8% | |
75 | 68 | 0.8% | 64 | 0.7% | |
76 | 48 | 0.6% | 70 | 0.8% | |
77 | 48 | 0.6% | 65 | 0.7% | |
78 | 49 | 0.6% | 76 | 0.9% | |
79 | 50 | 0.6% | 73 | 0.8% | |
80 | 42 | 0.5% | 71 | 0.8% | |
81 | 49 | 0.6% | 64 | 0.7% | |
82 | 29 | 0.4% | 58 | 0.7% | |
83 | 30 | 0.4% | 53 | 0.6% | |
84 | 23 | 0.3% | 59 | 0.7% | |
85 | 18 | 0.2% | 43 | 0.5% | |
86 | 28 | 0.3% | 43 | 0.5% | |
87 | 14 | 0.2% | 37 | 0.4% | |
88 | 22 | 0.3% | 42 | 0.5% | |
89 | 10 | 0.1% | 28 | 0.3% | |
90 | 6 | 0.1% | 34 | 0.4% | |
91 | 6 | 0.1% | 25 | 0.3% | |
92 | 3 | 0.0% | 29 | 0.3% | |
93 | 5 | 0.1% | 14 | 0.2% | |
94 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 0.2% | |
95 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 0.1% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 0.1% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
98 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 0.1% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |