Cedar Vale city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.8% | |
1 | 8 | 2.3% | 2 | 0.5% | |
2 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% | |
3 | 5 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.8% | |
4 | 7 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.3% | |
5 | 4 | 1.1% | 4 | 1.1% | |
6 | 9 | 2.6% | 5 | 1.3% | |
7 | 3 | 0.9% | 6 | 1.6% | |
8 | 4 | 1.1% | 4 | 1.1% | |
9 | 6 | 1.7% | 7 | 1.9% | |
10 | 5 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.8% | |
11 | 5 | 1.4% | 5 | 1.3% | |
12 | 8 | 2.3% | 3 | 0.8% | |
13 | 7 | 2.0% | 6 | 1.6% | |
14 | 4 | 1.1% | 6 | 1.6% | |
15 | 6 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.3% | |
16 | 6 | 1.7% | 7 | 1.9% | |
17 | 6 | 1.7% | 7 | 1.9% | |
18 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% | |
19 | 5 | 1.4% | 5 | 1.3% | |
20 | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.5% | |
21 | 1 | 0.3% | 4 | 1.1% | |
22 | 3 | 0.9% | 1 | 0.3% | |
23 | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.3% | |
24 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | |
25 | 1 | 0.3% | 5 | 1.3% | |
26 | 3 | 0.9% | 5 | 1.3% | |
27 | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.5% | |
28 | 5 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.8% | |
29 | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.5% | |
30 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.5% | |
32 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% | |
33 | 1 | 0.3% | 4 | 1.1% | |
34 | 4 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.8% | |
35 | 4 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.3% | |
36 | 3 | 0.9% | 6 | 1.6% | |
37 | 2 | 0.6% | 4 | 1.1% | |
38 | 6 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.8% | |
39 | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.8% | |
40 | 1 | 0.3% | 4 | 1.1% | |
41 | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.8% | |
42 | 4 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.8% | |
43 | 4 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.3% | |
44 | 6 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.8% | |
45 | 6 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.3% | |
46 | 7 | 2.0% | 6 | 1.6% | |
47 | 1 | 0.3% | 5 | 1.3% | |
48 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.5% | |
49 | 4 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.3% | |
50 | 2 | 0.6% | 10 | 2.7% | |
51 | 5 | 1.4% | 5 | 1.3% |
(Cedar Vale city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 4 | 1.1% | 6 | 1.6% | |
53 | 4 | 1.1% | 7 | 1.9% | |
54 | 5 | 1.4% | 4 | 1.1% | |
55 | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.5% | |
56 | 5 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.5% | |
57 | 5 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.8% | |
58 | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.8% | |
59 | 4 | 1.1% | 4 | 1.1% | |
60 | 8 | 2.3% | 8 | 2.1% | |
61 | 4 | 1.1% | 4 | 1.1% | |
62 | 4 | 1.1% | 4 | 1.1% | |
63 | 4 | 1.1% | 2 | 0.5% | |
64 | 6 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.3% | |
65 | 7 | 2.0% | 3 | 0.8% | |
66 | 2 | 0.6% | 6 | 1.6% | |
67 | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.5% | |
68 | 4 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.3% | |
69 | 7 | 2.0% | 2 | 0.5% | |
70 | 1 | 0.3% | 5 | 1.3% | |
71 | 5 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.5% | |
72 | 2 | 0.6% | 5 | 1.3% | |
73 | 6 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.8% | |
74 | 2 | 0.6% | 4 | 1.1% | |
75 | 4 | 1.1% | 6 | 1.6% | |
76 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% | |
77 | 4 | 1.1% | 9 | 2.4% | |
78 | 7 | 2.0% | 5 | 1.3% | |
79 | 1 | 0.3% | 11 | 2.9% | |
80 | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | |
81 | 3 | 0.9% | 6 | 1.6% | |
82 | 5 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.5% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 3 | 0.9% | 10 | 2.7% | |
84 | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.5% | |
85 | 2 | 0.6% | 4 | 1.1% | |
86 | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | |
87 | 6 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.8% | |
88 | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.8% | |
89 | 3 | 0.9% | 6 | 1.6% | |
90 | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.8% | |
91 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
92 | 1 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.8% | |
93 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
94 | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
95 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.5% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | |
98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |