Elsmore city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
2 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
3 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
4 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
5 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
6 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
7 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
8 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
9 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
10 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
11 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
12 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
13 | 2 | 4.7% | 0 | 0.0% | |
14 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
15 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
16 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
17 | 2 | 4.7% | 0 | 0.0% | |
18 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
19 | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 3.3% | |
20 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
21 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
22 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
23 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
24 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
25 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
26 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
27 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
28 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
29 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
30 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
32 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
33 | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 3.3% | |
34 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
35 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
36 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
37 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
38 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
39 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
40 | 2 | 4.7% | 2 | 6.7% | |
41 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
42 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
43 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
44 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
45 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
46 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
47 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
48 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
49 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
50 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
51 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% |
(Elsmore city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 6.7% | |
53 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
54 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
55 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
56 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
57 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
58 | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 3.3% | |
59 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
60 | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 3.3% | |
61 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
62 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 10.0% | |
63 | 3 | 7.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
64 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
65 | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 3.3% | |
66 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
67 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
68 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
69 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
70 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
71 | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 3.3% | |
72 | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 3.3% | |
73 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
74 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
75 | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 3.3% | |
76 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
77 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
78 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 6.7% | |
79 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
80 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
81 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
82 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
84 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
85 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.3% | |
86 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
87 | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | |
88 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
89 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
90 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
91 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
92 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
93 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
94 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
95 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |