Junction City city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 203 | 2.2% | 171 | 1.7% | |
1 | 188 | 2.1% | 152 | 1.6% | |
2 | 158 | 1.7% | 173 | 1.8% | |
3 | 153 | 1.7% | 140 | 1.4% | |
4 | 157 | 1.7% | 152 | 1.6% | |
5 | 177 | 1.9% | 149 | 1.5% | |
6 | 159 | 1.7% | 135 | 1.4% | |
7 | 140 | 1.5% | 136 | 1.4% | |
8 | 135 | 1.5% | 149 | 1.5% | |
9 | 130 | 1.4% | 131 | 1.3% | |
10 | 163 | 1.8% | 124 | 1.3% | |
11 | 147 | 1.6% | 145 | 1.5% | |
12 | 118 | 1.3% | 131 | 1.3% | |
13 | 145 | 1.6% | 159 | 1.6% | |
14 | 136 | 1.5% | 134 | 1.4% | |
15 | 145 | 1.6% | 143 | 1.5% | |
16 | 143 | 1.6% | 117 | 1.2% | |
17 | 150 | 1.6% | 141 | 1.4% | |
18 | 140 | 1.5% | 172 | 1.8% | |
19 | 146 | 1.6% | 193 | 2.0% | |
20 | 173 | 1.9% | 228 | 2.3% | |
21 | 172 | 1.9% | 198 | 2.0% | |
22 | 215 | 2.4% | 208 | 2.1% | |
23 | 192 | 2.1% | 166 | 1.7% | |
24 | 148 | 1.6% | 176 | 1.8% | |
25 | 144 | 1.6% | 167 | 1.7% | |
26 | 147 | 1.6% | 150 | 1.5% | |
27 | 153 | 1.7% | 145 | 1.5% | |
28 | 153 | 1.7% | 147 | 1.5% | |
29 | 150 | 1.6% | 140 | 1.4% | |
30 | 137 | 1.5% | 115 | 1.2% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 120 | 1.3% | 115 | 1.2% | |
32 | 107 | 1.2% | 110 | 1.1% | |
33 | 109 | 1.2% | 128 | 1.3% | |
34 | 130 | 1.4% | 124 | 1.3% | |
35 | 114 | 1.3% | 138 | 1.4% | |
36 | 139 | 1.5% | 153 | 1.6% | |
37 | 145 | 1.6% | 130 | 1.3% | |
38 | 136 | 1.5% | 151 | 1.5% | |
39 | 152 | 1.7% | 145 | 1.5% | |
40 | 130 | 1.4% | 134 | 1.4% | |
41 | 120 | 1.3% | 138 | 1.4% | |
42 | 140 | 1.5% | 156 | 1.6% | |
43 | 139 | 1.5% | 139 | 1.4% | |
44 | 119 | 1.3% | 138 | 1.4% | |
45 | 134 | 1.5% | 124 | 1.3% | |
46 | 134 | 1.5% | 104 | 1.1% | |
47 | 142 | 1.6% | 158 | 1.6% | |
48 | 117 | 1.3% | 110 | 1.1% | |
49 | 91 | 1.0% | 115 | 1.2% | |
50 | 100 | 1.1% | 89 | 0.9% | |
51 | 97 | 1.1% | 99 | 1.0% |
(Junction City city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 90 | 1.0% | 97 | 1.0% | |
53 | 87 | 1.0% | 105 | 1.1% | |
54 | 58 | 0.6% | 68 | 0.7% | |
55 | 65 | 0.7% | 96 | 1.0% | |
56 | 81 | 0.9% | 93 | 1.0% | |
57 | 81 | 0.9% | 84 | 0.9% | |
58 | 62 | 0.7% | 62 | 0.6% | |
59 | 61 | 0.7% | 70 | 0.7% | |
60 | 65 | 0.7% | 72 | 0.7% | |
61 | 66 | 0.7% | 65 | 0.7% | |
62 | 47 | 0.5% | 74 | 0.8% | |
63 | 55 | 0.6% | 72 | 0.7% | |
64 | 45 | 0.5% | 59 | 0.6% | |
65 | 44 | 0.5% | 67 | 0.7% | |
66 | 64 | 0.7% | 55 | 0.6% | |
67 | 45 | 0.5% | 74 | 0.8% | |
68 | 36 | 0.4% | 62 | 0.6% | |
69 | 46 | 0.5% | 70 | 0.7% | |
70 | 54 | 0.6% | 56 | 0.6% | |
71 | 51 | 0.6% | 54 | 0.6% | |
72 | 42 | 0.5% | 62 | 0.6% | |
73 | 39 | 0.4% | 62 | 0.6% | |
74 | 34 | 0.4% | 67 | 0.7% | |
75 | 40 | 0.4% | 65 | 0.7% | |
76 | 39 | 0.4% | 53 | 0.5% | |
77 | 28 | 0.3% | 47 | 0.5% | |
78 | 33 | 0.4% | 50 | 0.5% | |
79 | 33 | 0.4% | 55 | 0.6% | |
80 | 33 | 0.4% | 51 | 0.5% | |
81 | 24 | 0.3% | 38 | 0.4% | |
82 | 28 | 0.3% | 38 | 0.4% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 22 | 0.2% | 26 | 0.3% | |
84 | 17 | 0.2% | 29 | 0.3% | |
85 | 13 | 0.1% | 28 | 0.3% | |
86 | 10 | 0.1% | 23 | 0.2% | |
87 | 10 | 0.1% | 18 | 0.2% | |
88 | 12 | 0.1% | 32 | 0.3% | |
89 | 3 | 0.0% | 16 | 0.2% | |
90 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 0.2% | |
91 | 3 | 0.0% | 14 | 0.1% | |
92 | 5 | 0.1% | 12 | 0.1% | |
93 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 0.1% | |
94 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.1% | |
95 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.0% | |
96 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.0% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.1% | |
98 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |