Source:
U.S. Bureau of the Census,
2000 Census,
Summary File 1
Please email comments to:
| Natoma city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
| AGE | Male | Female | |
||
| Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
| under 1 year | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 1 | 3 | 1.6% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 2 | 2 | 1.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 4 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 5 | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1.1% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 7 | 4 | 2.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 9 | 5 | 2.7% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 10 | 4 | 2.1% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 11 | 3 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 12 | 2 | 1.1% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 13 | 1 | 0.5% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 14 | 5 | 2.7% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 15 | 5 | 2.7% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 16 | 6 | 3.2% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 17 | 4 | 2.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 18 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 21 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 22 | 4 | 2.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 23 | 2 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 24 | 2 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 25 | 3 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 26 | 2 | 1.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 27 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 29 | 5 | 2.7% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 30 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
| 31 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0.5% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0.5% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 35 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 36 | 4 | 2.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 37 | 3 | 1.6% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 38 | 4 | 2.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 39 | 7 | 3.7% | 5 | 2.8% | |
| 40 | 3 | 1.6% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 1.6% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1.1% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 44 | 5 | 2.7% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 45 | 8 | 4.3% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 46 | 3 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 47 | 6 | 3.2% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0.5% | 6 | 3.4% | |
| 50 | 5 | 2.7% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 51 | 4 | 2.1% | 2 | 1.1% | |
(Natoma city continued)
| AGE | Male | Female | |
||
| Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
| 52 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 53 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 59 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 60 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 61 | 2 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 62 | 3 | 1.6% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 63 | 2 | 1.1% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 64 | 5 | 2.7% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 65 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 66 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 67 | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 68 | 1 | 0.5% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 69 | 5 | 2.7% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0.5% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 71 | 2 | 1.1% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 72 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 73 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 74 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 75 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 76 | 1 | 0.5% | 7 | 3.9% | |
| 77 | 1 | 0.5% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 78 | 1 | 0.5% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 79 | 3 | 1.6% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 80 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 81 | 1 | 0.5% | 2 | 1.1% | |
| 82 | 2 | 1.1% | 6 | 3.4% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
| 83 | 4 | 2.1% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 84 | 2 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 85 | 3 | 1.6% | 4 | 2.2% | |
| 86 | 1 | 0.5% | 3 | 1.7% | |
| 87 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 88 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 89 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 90 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | |
| 91 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 92 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 93 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 94 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 95 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 96 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 97 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 99 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |