Newton city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 139 | 1.7% | 125 | 1.4% | |
1 | 133 | 1.6% | 121 | 1.4% | |
2 | 119 | 1.4% | 124 | 1.4% | |
3 | 113 | 1.4% | 115 | 1.3% | |
4 | 147 | 1.8% | 112 | 1.3% | |
5 | 121 | 1.5% | 109 | 1.2% | |
6 | 115 | 1.4% | 114 | 1.3% | |
7 | 121 | 1.5% | 114 | 1.3% | |
8 | 132 | 1.6% | 120 | 1.3% | |
9 | 127 | 1.5% | 120 | 1.3% | |
10 | 141 | 1.7% | 140 | 1.6% | |
11 | 115 | 1.4% | 119 | 1.3% | |
12 | 114 | 1.4% | 140 | 1.6% | |
13 | 124 | 1.5% | 111 | 1.2% | |
14 | 125 | 1.5% | 148 | 1.7% | |
15 | 129 | 1.6% | 150 | 1.7% | |
16 | 146 | 1.8% | 112 | 1.3% | |
17 | 132 | 1.6% | 139 | 1.6% | |
18 | 127 | 1.5% | 93 | 1.0% | |
19 | 94 | 1.1% | 86 | 1.0% | |
20 | 84 | 1.0% | 87 | 1.0% | |
21 | 100 | 1.2% | 92 | 1.0% | |
22 | 86 | 1.0% | 102 | 1.1% | |
23 | 106 | 1.3% | 131 | 1.5% | |
24 | 113 | 1.4% | 96 | 1.1% | |
25 | 112 | 1.4% | 91 | 1.0% | |
26 | 110 | 1.3% | 106 | 1.2% | |
27 | 122 | 1.5% | 98 | 1.1% | |
28 | 118 | 1.4% | 106 | 1.2% | |
29 | 105 | 1.3% | 113 | 1.3% | |
30 | 125 | 1.5% | 126 | 1.4% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 102 | 1.2% | 110 | 1.2% | |
32 | 131 | 1.6% | 96 | 1.1% | |
33 | 98 | 1.2% | 110 | 1.2% | |
34 | 118 | 1.4% | 124 | 1.4% | |
35 | 115 | 1.4% | 114 | 1.3% | |
36 | 125 | 1.5% | 116 | 1.3% | |
37 | 130 | 1.6% | 152 | 1.7% | |
38 | 124 | 1.5% | 135 | 1.5% | |
39 | 144 | 1.7% | 134 | 1.5% | |
40 | 121 | 1.5% | 130 | 1.5% | |
41 | 126 | 1.5% | 153 | 1.7% | |
42 | 139 | 1.7% | 133 | 1.5% | |
43 | 139 | 1.7% | 124 | 1.4% | |
44 | 147 | 1.8% | 132 | 1.5% | |
45 | 113 | 1.4% | 123 | 1.4% | |
46 | 116 | 1.4% | 131 | 1.5% | |
47 | 120 | 1.4% | 127 | 1.4% | |
48 | 122 | 1.5% | 132 | 1.5% | |
49 | 109 | 1.3% | 113 | 1.3% | |
50 | 113 | 1.4% | 106 | 1.2% | |
51 | 110 | 1.3% | 97 | 1.1% |
(Newton city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 106 | 1.3% | 109 | 1.2% | |
53 | 97 | 1.2% | 97 | 1.1% | |
54 | 82 | 1.0% | 73 | 0.8% | |
55 | 85 | 1.0% | 84 | 0.9% | |
56 | 72 | 0.9% | 96 | 1.1% | |
57 | 66 | 0.8% | 74 | 0.8% | |
58 | 55 | 0.7% | 63 | 0.7% | |
59 | 61 | 0.7% | 63 | 0.7% | |
60 | 68 | 0.8% | 67 | 0.8% | |
61 | 56 | 0.7% | 74 | 0.8% | |
62 | 63 | 0.8% | 75 | 0.8% | |
63 | 61 | 0.7% | 73 | 0.8% | |
64 | 66 | 0.8% | 65 | 0.7% | |
65 | 54 | 0.7% | 57 | 0.6% | |
66 | 56 | 0.7% | 62 | 0.7% | |
67 | 51 | 0.6% | 65 | 0.7% | |
68 | 53 | 0.6% | 75 | 0.8% | |
69 | 48 | 0.6% | 72 | 0.8% | |
70 | 59 | 0.7% | 72 | 0.8% | |
71 | 60 | 0.7% | 80 | 0.9% | |
72 | 56 | 0.7% | 87 | 1.0% | |
73 | 66 | 0.8% | 71 | 0.8% | |
74 | 54 | 0.7% | 91 | 1.0% | |
75 | 54 | 0.7% | 68 | 0.8% | |
76 | 60 | 0.7% | 72 | 0.8% | |
77 | 53 | 0.6% | 54 | 0.6% | |
78 | 44 | 0.5% | 65 | 0.7% | |
79 | 40 | 0.5% | 65 | 0.7% | |
80 | 32 | 0.4% | 73 | 0.8% | |
81 | 39 | 0.5% | 67 | 0.8% | |
82 | 27 | 0.3% | 53 | 0.6% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 32 | 0.4% | 55 | 0.6% | |
84 | 28 | 0.3% | 53 | 0.6% | |
85 | 16 | 0.2% | 59 | 0.7% | |
86 | 22 | 0.3% | 39 | 0.4% | |
87 | 23 | 0.3% | 52 | 0.6% | |
88 | 18 | 0.2% | 37 | 0.4% | |
89 | 13 | 0.2% | 31 | 0.3% | |
90 | 11 | 0.1% | 26 | 0.3% | |
91 | 8 | 0.1% | 28 | 0.3% | |
92 | 4 | 0.0% | 18 | 0.2% | |
93 | 3 | 0.0% | 20 | 0.2% | |
94 | 5 | 0.1% | 17 | 0.2% | |
95 | 4 | 0.0% | 14 | 0.2% | |
96 | 4 | 0.0% | 10 | 0.1% | |
97 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 0.1% | |
98 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.0% | |
99 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.1% | |
100 to 104 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 0.1% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |