Prairie Village city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 138 | 1.4% | 132 | 1.1% | |
1 | 115 | 1.1% | 126 | 1.1% | |
2 | 138 | 1.4% | 112 | 0.9% | |
3 | 129 | 1.3% | 125 | 1.0% | |
4 | 118 | 1.2% | 146 | 1.2% | |
5 | 152 | 1.5% | 123 | 1.0% | |
6 | 103 | 1.0% | 130 | 1.1% | |
7 | 142 | 1.4% | 127 | 1.1% | |
8 | 142 | 1.4% | 119 | 1.0% | |
9 | 149 | 1.5% | 131 | 1.1% | |
10 | 154 | 1.5% | 147 | 1.2% | |
11 | 148 | 1.5% | 139 | 1.2% | |
12 | 151 | 1.5% | 145 | 1.2% | |
13 | 153 | 1.5% | 156 | 1.3% | |
14 | 131 | 1.3% | 142 | 1.2% | |
15 | 136 | 1.3% | 147 | 1.2% | |
16 | 151 | 1.5% | 129 | 1.1% | |
17 | 148 | 1.5% | 124 | 1.0% | |
18 | 113 | 1.1% | 96 | 0.8% | |
19 | 78 | 0.8% | 54 | 0.5% | |
20 | 57 | 0.6% | 49 | 0.4% | |
21 | 45 | 0.4% | 55 | 0.5% | |
22 | 59 | 0.6% | 54 | 0.5% | |
23 | 62 | 0.6% | 93 | 0.8% | |
24 | 95 | 0.9% | 112 | 0.9% | |
25 | 135 | 1.3% | 119 | 1.0% | |
26 | 139 | 1.4% | 134 | 1.1% | |
27 | 114 | 1.1% | 152 | 1.3% | |
28 | 172 | 1.7% | 177 | 1.5% | |
29 | 156 | 1.5% | 208 | 1.7% | |
30 | 174 | 1.7% | 177 | 1.5% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 179 | 1.8% | 156 | 1.3% | |
32 | 134 | 1.3% | 145 | 1.2% | |
33 | 153 | 1.5% | 148 | 1.2% | |
34 | 151 | 1.5% | 151 | 1.3% | |
35 | 157 | 1.5% | 163 | 1.4% | |
36 | 148 | 1.5% | 172 | 1.4% | |
37 | 141 | 1.4% | 190 | 1.6% | |
38 | 150 | 1.5% | 189 | 1.6% | |
39 | 172 | 1.7% | 225 | 1.9% | |
40 | 157 | 1.5% | 177 | 1.5% | |
41 | 157 | 1.5% | 185 | 1.6% | |
42 | 171 | 1.7% | 197 | 1.7% | |
43 | 152 | 1.5% | 199 | 1.7% | |
44 | 160 | 1.6% | 195 | 1.6% | |
45 | 166 | 1.6% | 194 | 1.6% | |
46 | 144 | 1.4% | 206 | 1.7% | |
47 | 144 | 1.4% | 174 | 1.5% | |
48 | 159 | 1.6% | 193 | 1.6% | |
49 | 170 | 1.7% | 174 | 1.5% | |
50 | 140 | 1.4% | 188 | 1.6% | |
51 | 133 | 1.3% | 174 | 1.5% |
(Prairie Village city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 156 | 1.5% | 172 | 1.4% | |
53 | 139 | 1.4% | 195 | 1.6% | |
54 | 137 | 1.4% | 129 | 1.1% | |
55 | 101 | 1.0% | 132 | 1.1% | |
56 | 104 | 1.0% | 148 | 1.2% | |
57 | 110 | 1.1% | 127 | 1.1% | |
58 | 95 | 0.9% | 114 | 1.0% | |
59 | 94 | 0.9% | 115 | 1.0% | |
60 | 73 | 0.7% | 97 | 0.8% | |
61 | 69 | 0.7% | 125 | 1.0% | |
62 | 61 | 0.6% | 83 | 0.7% | |
63 | 74 | 0.7% | 111 | 0.9% | |
64 | 89 | 0.9% | 94 | 0.8% | |
65 | 81 | 0.8% | 81 | 0.7% | |
66 | 72 | 0.7% | 91 | 0.8% | |
67 | 92 | 0.9% | 91 | 0.8% | |
68 | 77 | 0.8% | 116 | 1.0% | |
69 | 66 | 0.7% | 121 | 1.0% | |
70 | 72 | 0.7% | 102 | 0.9% | |
71 | 90 | 0.9% | 115 | 1.0% | |
72 | 78 | 0.8% | 135 | 1.1% | |
73 | 80 | 0.8% | 124 | 1.0% | |
74 | 77 | 0.8% | 130 | 1.1% | |
75 | 85 | 0.8% | 137 | 1.1% | |
76 | 89 | 0.9% | 146 | 1.2% | |
77 | 83 | 0.8% | 142 | 1.2% | |
78 | 87 | 0.9% | 137 | 1.1% | |
79 | 92 | 0.9% | 102 | 0.9% | |
80 | 61 | 0.6% | 97 | 0.8% | |
81 | 76 | 0.7% | 103 | 0.9% | |
82 | 54 | 0.5% | 107 | 0.9% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 53 | 0.5% | 70 | 0.6% | |
84 | 45 | 0.4% | 84 | 0.7% | |
85 | 38 | 0.4% | 74 | 0.6% | |
86 | 33 | 0.3% | 57 | 0.5% | |
87 | 28 | 0.3% | 45 | 0.4% | |
88 | 23 | 0.2% | 40 | 0.3% | |
89 | 14 | 0.1% | 36 | 0.3% | |
90 | 13 | 0.1% | 33 | 0.3% | |
91 | 13 | 0.1% | 19 | 0.2% | |
92 | 16 | 0.2% | 26 | 0.2% | |
93 | 6 | 0.1% | 14 | 0.1% | |
94 | 5 | 0.0% | 16 | 0.1% | |
95 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 0.1% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.0% | |
97 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.0% | |
98 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |