Seneca city 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 17 | 1.7% | 18 | 1.6% | |
1 | 20 | 2.0% | 12 | 1.1% | |
2 | 9 | 0.9% | 15 | 1.3% | |
3 | 9 | 0.9% | 11 | 1.0% | |
4 | 8 | 0.8% | 9 | 0.8% | |
5 | 9 | 0.9% | 19 | 1.7% | |
6 | 14 | 1.4% | 10 | 0.9% | |
7 | 13 | 1.3% | 14 | 1.2% | |
8 | 17 | 1.7% | 11 | 1.0% | |
9 | 13 | 1.3% | 17 | 1.5% | |
10 | 15 | 1.5% | 19 | 1.7% | |
11 | 18 | 1.8% | 16 | 1.4% | |
12 | 16 | 1.6% | 14 | 1.2% | |
13 | 14 | 1.4% | 18 | 1.6% | |
14 | 9 | 0.9% | 19 | 1.7% | |
15 | 18 | 1.8% | 23 | 2.0% | |
16 | 23 | 2.3% | 20 | 1.8% | |
17 | 19 | 1.9% | 16 | 1.4% | |
18 | 16 | 1.6% | 17 | 1.5% | |
19 | 12 | 1.2% | 11 | 1.0% | |
20 | 16 | 1.6% | 3 | 0.3% | |
21 | 8 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.4% | |
22 | 5 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.4% | |
23 | 10 | 1.0% | 10 | 0.9% | |
24 | 4 | 0.4% | 8 | 0.7% | |
25 | 6 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.4% | |
26 | 8 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.4% | |
27 | 10 | 1.0% | 6 | 0.5% | |
28 | 11 | 1.1% | 7 | 0.6% | |
29 | 6 | 0.6% | 12 | 1.1% | |
30 | 18 | 1.8% | 9 | 0.8% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 11 | 1.1% | 9 | 0.8% | |
32 | 10 | 1.0% | 6 | 0.5% | |
33 | 12 | 1.2% | 12 | 1.1% | |
34 | 7 | 0.7% | 10 | 0.9% | |
35 | 12 | 1.2% | 13 | 1.1% | |
36 | 14 | 1.4% | 16 | 1.4% | |
37 | 17 | 1.7% | 16 | 1.4% | |
38 | 12 | 1.2% | 15 | 1.3% | |
39 | 11 | 1.1% | 21 | 1.8% | |
40 | 19 | 1.9% | 11 | 1.0% | |
41 | 14 | 1.4% | 13 | 1.1% | |
42 | 12 | 1.2% | 10 | 0.9% | |
43 | 19 | 1.9% | 22 | 1.9% | |
44 | 14 | 1.4% | 6 | 0.5% | |
45 | 10 | 1.0% | 19 | 1.7% | |
46 | 10 | 1.0% | 13 | 1.1% | |
47 | 18 | 1.8% | 20 | 1.8% | |
48 | 17 | 1.7% | 17 | 1.5% | |
49 | 18 | 1.8% | 6 | 0.5% | |
50 | 14 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.3% | |
51 | 12 | 1.2% | 9 | 0.8% |
(Seneca city continued)
AGE | Male | Female | |||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 8 | 0.8% | 8 | 0.7% | |
53 | 11 | 1.1% | 10 | 0.9% | |
54 | 6 | 0.6% | 13 | 1.1% | |
55 | 6 | 0.6% | 6 | 0.5% | |
56 | 7 | 0.7% | 10 | 0.9% | |
57 | 11 | 1.1% | 9 | 0.8% | |
58 | 6 | 0.6% | 10 | 0.9% | |
59 | 3 | 0.3% | 9 | 0.8% | |
60 | 10 | 1.0% | 11 | 1.0% | |
61 | 9 | 0.9% | 7 | 0.6% | |
62 | 6 | 0.6% | 15 | 1.3% | |
63 | 8 | 0.8% | 12 | 1.1% | |
64 | 8 | 0.8% | 7 | 0.6% | |
65 | 9 | 0.9% | 12 | 1.1% | |
66 | 7 | 0.7% | 12 | 1.1% | |
67 | 9 | 0.9% | 15 | 1.3% | |
68 | 5 | 0.5% | 12 | 1.1% | |
69 | 6 | 0.6% | 14 | 1.2% | |
70 | 11 | 1.1% | 17 | 1.5% | |
71 | 10 | 1.0% | 19 | 1.7% | |
72 | 15 | 1.5% | 13 | 1.1% | |
73 | 8 | 0.8% | 13 | 1.1% | |
74 | 12 | 1.2% | 24 | 2.1% | |
75 | 14 | 1.4% | 9 | 0.8% | |
76 | 11 | 1.1% | 16 | 1.4% | |
77 | 13 | 1.3% | 14 | 1.2% | |
78 | 10 | 1.0% | 16 | 1.4% | |
79 | 10 | 1.0% | 8 | 0.7% | |
80 | 5 | 0.5% | 20 | 1.8% | |
81 | 2 | 0.2% | 16 | 1.4% | |
82 | 2 | 0.2% | 8 | 0.7% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 7 | 0.7% | 13 | 1.1% | |
84 | 9 | 0.9% | 10 | 0.9% | |
85 | 6 | 0.6% | 7 | 0.6% | |
86 | 3 | 0.3% | 11 | 1.0% | |
87 | 6 | 0.6% | 17 | 1.5% | |
88 | 2 | 0.2% | 10 | 0.9% | |
89 | 7 | 0.7% | 7 | 0.6% | |
90 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2% | |
91 | 2 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.4% | |
92 | 2 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.4% | |
93 | 5 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.4% | |
94 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.3% | |
95 | 3 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.1% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.3% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.3% | |
98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |